Knock3

08/06/2012 Zoloft Lawyer: Prior to planning for a Zoloft Lawsuit, you should become familiar with the drug Zoloft. Zoloft (sertraline) is used to treat depression, panic attacks, post-traumatic stress disorder, social anxiety disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder. This medication has been linked to birth defects such as Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn (PPHN). Searching for a qualified Zoloft Lawyer can be a daunting task. Call Best Legal Source at (800) 611-7080 or complete the contact form to the right and we will connect you with a Zoloft Lawyer who will answer any questions you may have regarding the filing of Zoloft Lawsuits.

 

What are some reasons individuals are seeking a Zoloft Lawyer?

Families overwhelmed by the high medical costs of a child’s birth defect may turn to a Zoloft Lawsuit to recover financial compensation. Zoloft is in a class of antidepressants called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In December 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) kept the public informed regarding the potential risk of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn (PPHN) for those women using SSRIs during pregnancy. If your baby has suffered from PPHN, you may want to consult with a Zoloft Lawyer to determine if you are eligible for a Zoloft Lawsuit.

 

What will Zoloft Lawyer charge to file?

It will cost you nothing to file a Zoloft Lawsuit. The Zoloft Lawyer groups we connect you with represent clients on a contingency basis. This means the Zoloft Lawyer is paid a percentage of the earnings from a successful Zoloft Lawsuit.

Do I have a certain period of time to file a Zoloft Lawsuit?

There are certain time limitations on how long an individual can wait to file a Zoloft Lawsuit. The answer to this question varies depending on the law of the state that pertains to your claim. These are called statute of limitations. Consequently, it is advisable to contact Best Legal Source immediately so that a Zoloft Lawyer can review your case.

 

What serious side effects of Zoloft might justify the filing of a Zoloft Lawsuit?

If you took this potentially unsafe drug during pregnancy and your child developed any medical complications, consider speaking with a Zoloft Lawyer to determine your eligibility to file a Zoloft Lawsuit. PPHN occurs when a newborn baby does not adjust to breathing outside the womb. They may require intensive care support including being on a ventilator. PPHN can result in multiple organ damage, including brain damage and even death. If your baby has suffered serious side effects after you used Zoloft during pregnancy, you may be entitled to collect reimbursement for injuries. To locate an experienced Zoloft Lawyer, contact Best Legal Source. Put your confidence in Best Legal Source to learn about Zoloft Lawsuit cases.

How is Best Legal Source involved with Zoloft Lawyer groups?

Zoloft Lawsuit, Zoloft Class Action Lawsuit and Zoloft Lawyer are broad terms used to reference the action filed against the manufacturer. Best Legal Source is not the maker of Zoloft or any product associated with birth defects. We are only involved with Zoloft Lawsuit filings because we put individuals harmed by Zoloft in touch with a Zoloft Lawyer with the skill to pursue this type of pharmaceutical litigation. Please refer to the manufacturer’s website if you are seeking information directly from the company that produces Zoloft.

 

Why should you file a Zoloft Lawsuit?

The public should feel confident that the pharmaceutical companies are making safe yet effective drugs. The manufacturers of drugs have a legal and moral obligation to extensively and continually monitor their products to ensure the public’s safety. By filing a Zoloft Lawsuit, you are expressing that putting dangerous drugs and medical devices on the market will not be tolerated. If your drug related injuries have caused you pain and suffering, call Best Legal Source to connect with a Zoloft Lawyer. You deserve financial compensation for the medical costs associated with your injuries.

What are some final thoughts regarding Zoloft Lawsuits?

Best Legal Source is committed to locating Zoloft Lawyer groups dedicated to defending the rights of innocent clients who have been injured by dangerous drugs. The Zoloft Lawyer is skilled in successful pharmaceutical litigation. We believe in empowering our clients to hold drug companies accountable when their products destroy the quality of their lives. Because there are strict deadlines for filing Zoloft Lawsuit cases, please contacts us immediately by calling (800) 611-7080. Best Legal Source will help make this journey as stress-free as possible.

Example of an Actual Zoloft Lawsuit Trial Document

We have provided the following information below for your comprehension and understanding. The message Best Legal Source would like to give is included through comment and note sections and also through the headings in the Zoloft Lawsuit below. This information is not meant to be taken as legal advice and was written by someone who is not a Zoloft Lawyer.

We were not involved in the Zoloft Lawsuit at hand and we received the Zoloft Lawsuit document through public records.

Zoloft Lawsuit Real Example from New York

Durenda WILSON, as mother and natural guardian of Silas Wilson, a minor, and Durenda Wilson, Individually, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER INC., and Roerig, a division of Pfizer Inc, Defendants.

This is a product liability action brought on behalf of Plaintiff, DURENDA WILSON who was prescribed, purchased and correctly used sertraline hydrochloride, also known commercially as ZOLOFT (hereinafter “ZOLOFT”) to treat depression, and Plaintiff SILAS WILSON, a minor, who was exposed to ZOLOFT in utero.

Comment on Introduction By Zoloft Lawyer

The Zoloft Lawsuit information above is important for those reading the Zoloft Lawsuit to understand what might be the focus of this Zoloft Lawsuit. You can see from the above paragraph in the Zoloft Lawsuit that Durenda Wilson is filing against Pfizer on behalf of her son and herself in this Zoloft Lawsuit.

Defendant Pfizer in Zoloft Lawsuit, Introduced

Defendants, PFIZER INC., and ROERIG, a division of PFIZER INC., (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants”) designed, researched, manufactured, tested, advertised, promoted, marketed, sold, and distributed ZOLOFT for use as a prescription antidepressant medication.

Issues in this Zoloft Lawsuit

When warning of safety and risks of ZOLOFT, Defendants negligently and/or represented to the medical and healthcare community, the Food and Drug Administration (hereinafter referred to as “FDA”), to Plaintiff and the public in general, that ZOLOFT had been tested and was found to be safe and/or effective for its indicated use.

Defendants concealed their knowledge of ZOLOFT’s defects from Plaintiff, the FDA, the public in general and/or the medical community, specifically that ZOLOFT could cause birth defects to persons exposed in utero.

Intent of the Representations by Zoloft Lawsuit Defendant

These representations were made by Defendants with the intent of defrauding and deceiving Plaintiff, the public in general, and the medical and healthcare community in particular, and were made with the intent of inducing the public in general, and the medical community in particular, to recommend, dispense and/or purchase ZOLOFT for use as a prescription antidepressant, all of which evinced a callous, reckless, willful, depraved indifference to health, safety and welfare of the Plaintiff herein.

Defendants negligently and improperly failed to perform sufficient tests, if any, on humans using Zoloft during clinical trials regarding ZOLOFT’s potential to cause birth defects as a result of exposure in utero

Comment on the Above Zoloft Lawsuit Claim

To be clear: Best Legal Source did not write the above claims in the Zoloft Lawsuit. The Zoloft Lawyer in the Zoloft Lawsuit for the Zoloft Lawsuit plaintiff made all of the claims mentioned within this Zoloft Lawsuit. Continued below are the acts and omissions alleged by Zoloft Lawyer and plaintiff.

Result of Zoloft Lawsuit Defendant’s Actions

As a result of the foregoing acts and omissions, the Plaintiff was and still is caused to suffer serious and dangerous side effects including inter alia life threatening birth defects, as well as other severe and personal injuries which are permanent and lasting in nature, physical pain and mental anguish, including diminished enjoyment of life, as well as the need for lifelong medical treatment, monitoring and/or medications, and fear of developing any of the above named health consequences. Plaintiff herein has sustained certain of the above health consequences due to Plaintiffs exposure to ZOLOFT in utero.

Defendants concealed their knowledge of the defects in their products from the Plaintiff, and Plaintiffs physicians, hospitals, pharmacists, the FDA, and the public in general.

Consequently, Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages as a result of Plaintiff’s use of ZOLOFT, which has caused Plaintiff to suffer from life threatening birth defects, as well as other severe and personal injuries which are permanent and lasting in nature, physical pain and mental anguish, including diminished enjoyment of life, as well as the need for lifelong medical treatment, monitoring and/or medications, and fear of developing any of the above named health consequences.

Plaintiff in Zoloft Lawsuit from Washington is Described

Plaintiff, DURENDA WILSON is a citizen of the United States of America, and are resident’s of the State of Washington. The infant Plaintiff SILAS WILSON, was born on XX/XX/2004.

Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON, first began using Zoloft in or about September, 2003, and used Zoloft up and through approximately April 14, 2004.

As a result of using Defendants’ Zoloft, Plaintiff SILAS WILSON was caused to suffer birth defects, such as transposition of the great arteries, a ventricular septal defect, as well as other severe and personal injuries which are permanent and lasting in nature, physical pain and mental anguish, including diminished enjoyment of life, as well as the need for lifelong medical treatment, monitoring and/or medications.

Comment on Zoloft Lawsuit birth defects

The above paragraph in the Zoloft Lawsuit details the injuries suffered by Zoloft Lawsuit plaintiff and her son. The birth defects common in Zoloft Lawsuit claims are septal defects such as the one Silas has endured. The reason for filing a Zoloft Lawsuit is if the birth defect is severe as the septal defect for Silas must be to enter into a Zoloft Lawsuit claim.

Defendant in the Zoloft Lawsuit, Pfizer, is Introduced

Upon information and belief, Defendant PFIZER INC. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware having it headquarters and principal place of business at 235 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017-5755.

Defendant PFIZER INC. at all times relevant herein was in the business of designing, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing, promoting, selling and distributing ZOLOFT in the stream of commerce for use by the public, including Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON.

Defendant PFIZER INC. has transacted and conducted business in the State of New York and the State of Washington.

Comment on Material in Zoloft Lawsuit Not Included

Some information is omitted or left out of the Zoloft Lawsuit excerpt because we are only publishing portions of this Zoloft Lawsuit case. You can obtain a copy of the public record of Zoloft Lawsuit through searching for the particulars of those involved in this Zoloft Lawsuit.

Facts of this Zoloft Lawsuit

ZOLOFT is an antidepressant drug administered and/or used to manage depression. ZOLOFT is a brand name of sertraline hydrochloride and is a registered trademark of the PFIZER INC. . ZOLOFT and/or sertraline hydrochloride are available for use and/or sale in the United States. ZOLOFT belongs to a class of pharmaceuticals known as Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). Defendants, either directly or through their agents, servants, and employees, designed, manufactured, marketed, advertised, distributed, and sold ZOLOFT as an antidepressant drug.

Upon information and belief, Defendants obtained approval to manufacture, market, advertise, distribute and sell ZOLOFT

Medical literature and studies have established associations between exposure to SSRI drugs, including Defendants’ ZOLOFT, and birth defects in persons exposed in utero.

Knowledge of Zoloft Lawsuit Defendant, Pfizer

Defendants knew and/or should have known that ZOLOFT was associated with birth defects resulting from exposure in utero, through many scientific avenues, including but not limited to clinical trial data, epidemiological studies, medical literature and adverse event reports.

Nevertheless, Defendants failed to appropriately and/or adequately warn physicians or the public, including Plaintiff, of the risk of developing birth defects when exposed to ZOLOFT in utero.

Defendants failed to appropriately collect and report post-market surveillance data regarding the number of adverse events reported with their products.

Comment on Failure to Warn Among Zoloft Lawsuit Claims

It is often mentioned within Zoloft Lawsuit cases that the drug company failed to adequately warn about the risks involved in taking the medication, Zoloft. You can read the specifics of this accusation below in the remainder of the Zoloft Lawsuit. Particulars of the Zoloft Lawsuit may help to understand the circumstances.

Continued Accusations in Zoloft Lawsuit of Wilsons

Defendants concealed their knowledge of the unreasonably dangerous risks of exposure to ZOLOFT in utero from Plaintiffs, other consumers, and the medical community.

As a result of the defective nature of ZOLOFT, those persons who were administered, prescribed and/or ingested and/or were exposed to ZOLOFT in utero, including Plaintiffs, have suffered and may continue to suffer severe and permanent personal injuries.

Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON was prescribed and did ingest the antidepressant sertraline hydrochloride, also known as ZOLOFT, in accordance with the orders of her physician. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff, did ingest ZOLOFT at various times, including such time as she was pregnant with Plaintiff, SILAS WILSON.

Use of Zoloft by Zoloft Lawsuit Plaintiff

At all relevant times herein, Plaintiff used ZOLOFT as prescribed and in a reasonable and foreseeable manner. As a direct and proximate result of the use of Defendants’ ZOLOFT by Plaintiff, Plaintiff SILAS WILSON was exposed to ZOLOFT in utero.

Plaintiff SILAS WILSON was born on XX/XX/2004.

As a direct and proximate result of the use of Defendants’ ZOLOFT by Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON, Plaintiff SILAS WILSON suffered from and was diagnosed with birth defects on or about XX/XX/2004.

General Allegations within the Zoloft Lawsuit

Defendants had an obligation to comply with the law in the manufacture, design, and sale of ZOLOFT. Defendants had a duty to exercise reasonable care in the designing, researching, manufacturing, marketing, supplying, promoting, packaging, sale and/or distribution of ZOLOFT into the stream of commerce, including a duty to assure that the product would not cause users to suffer unreasonable, dangerous side effects.

Defendants failed to exercise ordinary care in the designing, researching, manufacturing, marketing, supplying, promoting, packaging, sale, testing, quality assurance, quality control, and/or distribution of ZOLOFT into interstate commerce in that Defendants knew or should have known that using ZOLOFT created a high risk of unreasonable, dangerous side effects, including, inter alia, birth defects in persons exposed to ZOLOFT in utero, as well as other severe and personal injuries which are permanent and lasting in nature, physical pain and mental anguish, including diminished enjoyment of life, as well as the need for lifelong medical treatment, monitoring and/or medications, and fear of developing any of the above named health consequences.

Comment on Negligence by Zoloft Lawsuit Defendant

The accusation surrounding in the Zoloft Lawsuit includes comments on negligence of Pfizer in regards to the health and care given to ensure the health of the Zoloft Lawsuit plaintiff who consumed Zoloft. The life and health of a child is at stake in cases such as the Zoloft Lawsuit. The company must prove they did everything possible to warn consumers of the risk their product might contain to win the Zoloft Lawsuit.

Knowledge of Zoloft Lawsuit Defendant on Side Effects

Despite the fact that Defendants knew or should have known that ZOLOFT caused unreasonably dangerous side effects, including birth defect resulting from exposure to ZOLOFT in utero, Defendants continued to market, manufacture, distribute and/or sell ZOLOFT to consumers, including the Plaintiffs.

Based on the aforesaid, Defendants had a duty to warn physicians of the dangers of using ZOLOFT, but failed to do so. Defendants’ actions, by violating statutes, ordinances and/or rules and regulations constituted negligence per se.

Defendants knew or should have known that consumers such as the Plaintiffs would foreseeably suffer injury as a result of Defendants’ failure to exercise ordinary care, as set forth above.

Result of Inaction in Zoloft Lawsuit Document Given:

Defendants’ negligence was the proximate cause of Plaintiffs’ injuries, harm and economic loss which they suffered and/or will continue to suffer.

As a result of the foregoing acts and omissions, the Plaintiff was caused to suffer birth defects, including transposition of the great arteries and ventricular septal defects, as well as other sever and personal injuries which are permanent and lasting in nature, physical pain and mental anguish, including diminished enjoyment of life, as well as the need for lifelong medical treatment, monitoring and/or medications.

As a result of the foregoing acts and omissions the Plaintiff requires and/or will require more health care and services and did incur medical, health, incidental and related expenses. Plaintiff is informed and believes and further alleges that Plaintiff will in the future be required to obtain further medical and/or hospital care, attention, and services.

Fifth Cause of Action—Fraudulent Misrepresentation

The Defendants falsely and fraudulently represented to the medical and healthcare community, and to the Plaintiff, and/or the FDA, and the public in general, that said product, ZOLOFT, had been tested and was found to be safe and/or effective for use as a prescription antidepressant, including by those consumers who were pregnant.

The representations made by Defendants were, in fact, false.

When said representations were made by Defendants, they knew those representations to be false and it willfully, wantonly and recklessly disregarded whether the representations were true.

Comment on Zoloft Lawsuit Allegations

The allegations within the Zoloft Lawsuit are from the attorney and plaintiff in the Zoloft Lawsuit. These claims are not made by Best Legal Source. The above allegation of fraudulent misrepresentation means that the defendant in the Zoloft Lawsuit did not properly and truthfully relay information to the Zoloft Lawsuit plaintiff.

Continued Statement in Zoloft Lawsuit of Defraud

These representations were made by Defendants with the intent of defrauding and deceiving the Plaintiff, the public in general, and the medical and healthcare community in particular, and were made with the intent of inducing the public in general, and the medical and healthcare community in particular, to recommend, prescribe, dispense and/or purchase said product, ZOLOFT, for use as a means of treating depression, all of which evinced a callous, reckless, willful, depraved indifference to the health, safety and welfare of the Plaintiff herein.

Defendants’ concealment and omissions of material facts concerning, inter alia, the safety of ZOLOFT was made purposefully, willfully, wantonly, and/or recklessly, to mislead Plaintiff, and their physicians, hospitals and healthcare providers into reliance, continued use of ZOLOFT, and actions thereon, and to cause them to purchase, prescribe, and/or dispense ZOLOFT and/or use the product.

Defendants knew that Plaintiff, and her physicians, hospitals, healthcare providers, and/or the FDA had no way to determine the truth behind Defendants’ concealment and omissions, and that these included material omissions of facts surrounding ZOLOFT, as set forth herein.

Zoloft Lawsuit Birth Defect Injury

As a result of the foregoing acts and omissions, the Plaintiff was caused to suffer birth defects, including transposition of the great arteries and ventricular septal defects, as well as other severe and personal injuries which are permanent and lasting in nature, physical pain and mental anguish, including diminished enjoyment of life, as well as the need for lifelong medical treatment, monitoring and/or medications.

As a result of the foregoing acts and omissions the Plaintiffs were caused to suffer and did incur medical, health, incidental and related expenses. Plaintiff is informed and believes and further alleges that Plaintiff will in the future be required to obtain further medical and/or hospital care, attention, and services.

Public FDA, Plaintiff Knowledge in Zoloft Lawsuit

The information distributed to the public, the FDA, and the Plaintiff, by Defendant intentionally included representations that Defendants’ drug ZOLOFT was more effective for antidepressant, thereby encouraging the use of ZOLOFT in circumstances other than those in which the drug has been approved, over-promises the benefits and minimizes the risk associated with ZOLOFT.

The information distributed to the public, the FDA, and the Plaintiff, by Defendants intentionally included false representations that exposure to ZOLOFT in utero was not injurious to the health and/or safety of its intended users.

That Defendants made claims and representations in its documents submitted to the FDA, to the public, to healthcare professionals, and the Plaintiff that in utero exposure to ZOLOFT did not present serious health and/or safety risks.

Loss of Consortium Zoloft Lawsuit Final Claim

Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON was and is the mother and natural guardian of Infant/Plaintiff SILAS WILSON, and as such, was and is entitled to the comfort, enjoyment, and society of her son and is responsible for his care, maintenance, support and attention.

That the Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON individually, being responsible for the Infant/Plaintiffs necessaries, became obligated for that medical and hospital expense, and medicines and was deprived of the Infant/Plaintiffs society, and may continue to be further obligated and further damaged thereby.

As a direct and proximate result of the foregoing, Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON was deprived of the comfort, enjoyment, and society of her son, Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON, has suffered and will continue to suffer economic loss, and has otherwise been emotionally and economically injured. The Plaintiff DURENDA WILSON injuries and damages are permanent and will continue into the future. The Plaintiffs seek actual and punitive damages from the Defendants as alleged herein.

End of Zoloft Lawsuit Example

Comment on Contacting Best Legal Source for Zoloft Lawyer Assistance

To contact Best Legal Source for information on pursuing a Zoloft Lawsuit, you can call (800) 611-7080. The assistance of a Zoloft Lawyer is valuable to the chances of success in pursuing a Zoloft Lawsuit. Please fill out the contact form above or call us today for relevant information for your Zoloft Lawsuit claim.

Zoloft Lawyer Resource Page

 

August 6, 2012, admin

Tags: Knock3, Zoloft Class Action Lawsuit, Zoloft Lawsuit, Zoloft Lawsuits, Zoloft Lawyer

Posted in: Knock3